Comparison Analysis of Different Machine Learning Models in Credit Overdue Prediction
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Financial institutions are currently grappling with the growth of non-performing assets (NPAs). The prediction accuracy of credit overdue directly determines the size of NPAs. For better prediction of repayment ability, data modeling methods are often introduced, which may cause over-fitting for new businesses with small data samples. This study performs case studies and enriches the small data samples by similarity with random forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, DNN, and TrAdaBoost transfer learning. It aims to provide an effective solution to insufficient samples during the model establishment for small sample businesses. The results show that the area under curve (AUC) of the five machine learning models is greater than 80 for small data samples after similar financial business data are integrated. The AUC of TrAdaBoost is at least 2 points higher than that of LightGBM, XGBoost, DNN, and random forest models on the prediction set. In addition, TrAdaBoost stands out with the highest precision (88%) and recall (73%).

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

陈霞.信用逾期预测中不同机器学习模型对比分析.计算机系统应用,2022,31(10):382-388

Copy
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:January 03,2022
  • Revised:January 29,2022
  • Online: June 28,2022
Article QR Code
You are the first1014291Visitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-3
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhongguancun,Haidian, Beijing,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62661041 Fax: Email:csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063