Research on Interactive Behavior of Pointing Cursors in Virtual Reality Based on Distance Cognition
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [36]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In virtual reality, the accurate cognition of egocentric distance and the reasonable design of pointing cursors play crucial roles in the user’s interactive experience and task execution efficiency. Given the extended research of Fitts’ law in three-dimensional pointing tasks, the interactive experiment of pointing cursors in virtual space was carried out taking the types of pointing cursors, egocentric distance, target size, and azimuth angles as variables. First, six hypotheses were proposed. For example, the difference among pointing cursors, egocentric distance, target size, and azimuth angles could affect the cognitive accuracy of egocentric distance and target pointing speed. Second, the target pointing accuracy and target pointing time were obtained based on the experimental data, and the change law of the cognitive accuracy of egocentric distance and target pointing speed was discussed. Experimental results showed that in virtual reality, the pointing cursor and target size all had a significant effect on the cognitive accuracy of egocentric distance and the target pointing speed, while the target azimuth angles and egocentric distance could only significantly affect the target pointing speed. The pointing cursor and egocentric distance had a two-way interactive effect on the cognitive accuracy of egocentric distance and the target pointing speed. The target pointing time of the two kinds of pointing cursors was linearly and positively correlated with the difficulty coefficient, which was consistent with the extended model of Fitts’ law in three-dimensional pointing tasks. This conclusion reveals the influencing factors of egocentric distance cognition, which can effectively guide the design of interactive methods and three-dimensional pointing tasks in virtual reality.

    Reference
    [1] Li BC. Distance perception in virtual environment through head-mounted displays[Master’s Thesis]. Michigan: Michigan Technological University, 2017.
    [2] Siegel ZD. Improving distance perception in virtual reality[Master’s Thesis]. Iowa State: Iowa State University, 2015.
    [3] Liu D, Rau PLP. Spatially incongruent sounds affect visual localization in virtual environments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82(4): 2067–2075. [doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01929-8
    [4] Loyola M. The influence of the availability of visual cues on the accurate perception of spatial dimensions in architectural virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 2018, 22(3): 235–243. [doi: 10.1007/s10055-017-0331-2
    [5] Woldegiorgis BH, Lin CJ, Liang WZ. Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays. Ergonomics, 2019, 62(1): 76–87. [doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1526328
    [6] Knapp JM, Loomis JM. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence, 2004, 13(5): 572–577. [doi: 10.1162/1054746042545238
    [7] Hornsey RL, Hibbard PB. Contributions of pictorial and binocular cues to the perception of distance in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 2021.
    [8] Vienne C, Masfrand S, Bourdin C, et al. Depth perception in virtual reality systems: Effect of screen distance, environment richness and display factors. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 29099–29110. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2972122
    [9] Li HS, Mavros P, Krukar J, et al. The effect of navigation method and visual display on distance perception in a large-scale virtual building. Cognitive Processing, 2021, 22(2): 239–259. [doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-01011-4
    [10] Lin CJ, Woldegiorgis BH. Interaction and visual performance in stereoscopic displays: A review. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2015, 23(7): 319–332. [doi: 10.1002/jsid.378
    [11] El Jamiy F, Marsh R. Survey on depth perception in head mounted displays: Distance estimation in virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. IET Image Processing, 2019, 13(5): 707–712. [doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5920
    [12] Kelly JW, Hammel W, Sjolund LA, et al. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2015, 77(6): 1848–1853. [doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0948-8
    [13] Wu B, Ooi TL, He ZJ. Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature, 2004, 428(6978): 73–77. [doi: 10.1038/nature02350
    [14] Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments—A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 2013, 46(2): 1–40. [doi: 10.1145/2543581.2543590
    [15] Kunz BR, Wouters L, Smith D, et al. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2009, 71(6): 1284–1293. [doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1284
    [16] Cutting JE, Vishton PM. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S, eds. Perception of Space and Motion. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. 69–117.
    [17] Lin CJ, Abreham BT, Caesaron D, et al. Exocentric distance judgment and accuracy of head-mounted and stereoscopic widescreen displays in frontal planes. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(4): 1427. [doi: 10.3390/app10041427
    [18] Wartenberg C, Wiborg P. Precision of exocentric distance judgments in desktop and cube presentation. Presence, 2003, 12(2): 196–206. [doi: 10.1162/105474603321640941
    [19] Dang NT. A survey and classification of 3D pointing techniques. Proceedings of 2007 IEEE International Conference on Research, Innovation and Vision for the Future. Hanoi: IEEE, 2007. 71–80.
    [20] Bruder G, Steinicke F, Stürzlinger W. Effects of visual conflicts on 3D selection task performance in stereoscopic display environments. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. Orlando: IEEE, 2013. 115–118.
    [21] Deng CL, Geng P, Hu YF, et al. Beyond fitts’s law: A Three-phase model predicts movement time to position an object in an immersive 3D virtual environment. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2019, 61(6): 879–894. [doi: 10.1177/0018720819831517
    [22] 张彤, 杨文虎, 郑锡宁. 图形用户界面环境中的鼠标操作活动分析. 应用心理学, 2003, 9(3): 14–19, 13. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2003.03.003
    [23] 何灿群. 基于拇指操作的中文手机键盘布局的工效学研究[博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2009.
    [24] Fu MJ, Hershberger AD, Sano K, et al. Effect of visuo-haptic co-location on 3D fitts’ task performance. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco: IEEE, 2011. 3460–3467.
    [25] Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1992, 121(3): 262–269. [doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262
    [26] Murata A, Iwase H. Extending Fitts’ law to a three-dimensional pointing task. Human Movement Science, 2001, 20(6): 791–805. [doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00058-6
    [27] Lin CJ, Woldegiorgis BH. Egocentric distance perception and performance of direct pointing in stereoscopic displays. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 64: 66–74. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.007
    [28] 丁玉兰, 程国萍. 人因工程学. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2013: 21–149
    [29] Naceri A, Chellali R, Dionnet F, et al. Depth perception within virtual environments: Comparison between two display technologies. International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, 2010, 3(1–2): 51–64
    [30] Hale KS, Stanney KM. Effects of low stereo acuity on performance, presence and sickness within a virtual environment. Applied Ergonomics, 2006, 37(3): 329–339. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.009
    [31] Mohler BJ, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB, et al. The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based virtual environment. Presence, 2010, 19(3): 230–242. [doi: 10.1162/pres.19.3.230
    [32] Bruder G, Argelaguet F, Olivier AH, et al. CAVE Size matters: Effects of screen distance and parallax on distance estimation in large immersive display setups. Presence, 2016, 25(1): 1–16. [doi: 10.1162/PRES_a_00241
    [33] Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, et al. Vergence—Accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 2008, 8(3): 33. [doi: 10.1167/8.3.33
    [34] 阮晓钢, 张晓平, 武璇, 等. 基于学习自动机的具有内发动机的感知运动系统的建立. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(2): 303–309
    [35] 任红格, 史涛, 张瑞成. 基于操作条件反射机制的感觉运动系统认知模型的建立. 机器人, 2012, 34(3): 292–298
    [36] Bridgeman B, Gemmer A, Forsman T, et al. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research, 2000, 40(25): 3539–3552. [doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00193-0
    Cited by
Get Citation

于佳雯,潘伟杰,吕健,付文娟.基于距离认知的虚拟现实指点交互行为研究.计算机系统应用,2022,31(3):9-18

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:876
  • PDF: 4900
  • HTML: 1502
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:May 11,2021
  • Revised:June 14,2021
  • Online: January 24,2022
Article QR Code
You are the first992294Visitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-3
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhongguancun,Haidian, Beijing,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62661041 Fax: Email:csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063