Comparison and Assessment of Land Use Information Extraction Methods Based on WorldView-2 Remote Sensing Image
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Based on the WorldView-2 high resolution remote sensing image in 2011, this study uses object-based classification method and four traditional pixel-based classification methods to extract study area land use information respectively. Then, Visual interpretation map is functioned as reference map to acquire each classification methods overall accuracy and to assess the each classification result and each class type from the aspects of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement. The result shows that: (1) The average overall classification accuracy is 75.00%. Among all the classification methods, the object-based classification method acquires the highest accuracy, 84.25%. The maximum likelihood classification method gets the lowest accuracy, 62.00%. (2) In all classification methods, the object-based classification method has obtained the lowest quantity disagreement, 4.25%. The others in sequence are as follows: neural net classification method < support vector machine method < mahalanobis distance method < maximum likelihood method. As to allocation disagreement, the support vector machine method has acquired the lowest value, 5.75%. The others in sequence are maximum likelihood method < neural net classification < mahalanobis distance method < object-based classification method. (3) As to separate class type, farmland does great influence on image's overall classification accuracy, whose quantity disagreement sequence is the maximum likelihood method(28.75%) > mahalanobis distance method(21.50%) > support vector machine method(14.75%) > neural net method(11.00%) > object-based method(3.00%). As for allocation disagreement, the sequence is object-based method(10.50%) > neural net method(5.00%) > support vector machine method(1.50%) > maximum likelihood method(0.50%) > mahalanobis distance method(0.00%).

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

季建万,沙晋明,金彪,包忠聪.基于WorldView-2影像的土地利用信息提取方法对比及评价.计算机系统应用,2018,27(3):36-43

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 05,2017
  • Revised:July 17,2017
  • Adopted:
  • Online: January 25,2018
  • Published:
Article QR Code
You are the firstVisitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-3
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhongguancun,Haidian, Beijing,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62661041 Fax: Email:csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063