建模与仿真实施质量文献综述
作者:

Literature Review of Modeling and Simulation Implementation Quality
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [50]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    从建模与仿真实施质量的定义及相关概念、仿真工作整体、仿真数据、建模过程、模型、结果等方面综述了近几十年的相关文献, 总结了现有研究成果. 目前建模与仿真实施质量的研究大部分集中在数据、仿真工作整体上, 从全生命周期的系统研究相对较少, 并且缺少规范化的框架确保建模与仿真实施的最终效果. 从全生命周期的角度研究实施质量是比较全面完整的, 所以其研究是很有必要的. 最后从生命周期角度展望了建模与仿真实施质量的研究方向.

    Abstract:

    The author reviews the related literatures in recent decades and summarizes existing research results from the definition of modeling and simulation implementation quality and related concepts, simulation work, simulation data, modeling process, model, results, etc. Most of current research partly foucuses on simulation work and data. The system research from the whole life cycle is relatively few, and there is a lack of a standardized framework to ensure the final effect of modeling and simulation implementation. However, the research from the perspective of the whole life cycle is more comprehensive, so it is very necessary. Finally, the research direction of modeling and simulation implementation quality are forecasted from the aspect of life cycle.

    参考文献
    [1] Annino JS, Russell EC. The seven most frequent causes of simulation analysis failure: And how to avoid them. Interfaces, 1981, 11(3): 59-63. [doi: 10.1287/inte.11.3.59
    [2] Robinson S, Pidd M. Service quality in the management of simulation projects. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, 1995. Arlington, VA, USA. 1995. 952-962.
    [3] Donn M. Tools for quality control in simulation. Building and Environment, 2001, 36(6): 673-680. [doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00059-7
    [4] IEEE. IEEE Standard Glossary of Modeling and Simulation Terminology. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1989.
    [5] 国防科技大学. GJB 6935-2009 军用仿真术语. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2009.
    [6] 中国仿真学会. 建模与仿真技术词典. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018. 8.
    [7] Robinson S. General concepts of quality for discrete-event simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 138(1): 103-117. [doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00127-8
    [8] Asbjornsen OA. Quality Assurance and Control (QAC) of uncertainty models and simulations of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. College Park, MD, USA. 1995. 252-257.
    [9] Stevenson DE. A critical look at quality in large-scale simulations. Computing in Science & Engineering, 1999, 1(3): 53-63
    [10] Sherman GR. The quality of a scientific simulation. ACM SIGSIM Simulation Digest, 1984, 15(3): 10-14. [doi: 10.1145/1102872.1102874
    [11] Balci O. Quality indicators throughout the modeling and simulation life cycle. In: Yilmaz L, ed. Concepts and Methodologies for Modeling and Simulation. Cham: Springer. 2015. 199-215.
    [12] Balci O. How to assess the acceptability and credibility of simulation results. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Winter Simulation. New York, NY, USA. 1989. 62-71.
    [13] Balci O. Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference. Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA. 1994. 215-220.
    [14] Balci O. Quality assessment, verification, and validation of modeling and simulation applications. Proceedings of 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington, WA, USA. 2005. 129.
    [15] Balci O. How to successfully conduct large-scale modeling and simulation projects. Proceedings of 2011 Winter Simulation Conference. Phoenix, AZ, USA. 2011. 176-182.
    [16] ISG. Fidelity ISG glossary. Proceedings of 1998 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Orlando, FL, USA. 1998.
    [17] 杨蓉, 刘玉坤. 建模与仿真逼真度理论与方法研究综述. 系统仿真技术, 2014, 10(2): 85-89, 95. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1964.2014.02.001
    [18] 贾仁耀, 刘湘伟. 建模与仿真的校核与验证技术综述. 计算机仿真, 2007, 24(4): 49-52. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2007.04.014
    [19] 贾仁耀, 刘湘伟. 建模与仿真的动态V&V技术综述. 计算机仿真, 2007, 24(3): 79-82. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2007.03.021
    [20] Ören TI. Quality assurance in cognizant simulative design. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Winter Simulation. Chicago, IL, USA. 1986. 850-852.
    [21] Smith JS, Hamilton JA, Nance RE, et al. Panel discussion: What makes good research in modeling and simulation: Assessing the quality, success, and utility of M&S research. Proceedings of 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. Miami, FL, USA. 2008. 689-694.
    [22] Gousseau P, Blocken B, van Heijst GJF. Quality assessment of Large-Eddy Simulation of wind flow around a high-rise building: Validation and solution verification. Computers & Fluids, 2013, 79: 120-133
    [23] Wang Z. Interactive virtual prototyping of a mechanical system considering the environment effect. Part 2: Simulation quality. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2011, 339(9): 605-615. [doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2011.06.003
    [24] 李小奇. 仿真性-新的质量属性. 大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年年会论文集. 深圳, 中国. 2007. 569-579.
    [25] 游景玉, 杨红兵, 沈彩虹. 在仿真行业建立和实施ISO9000质量体系的实践. 99全国仿真技术学术会议论文集. 珠海, 中国. 1999. 10-13.
    [26] Byrne J, Byrne PJ, Ferreira DCE, et al. The simulation life-cycle: Supporting the data collection and representation phase. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014. Savanah, GA, USA. 2014. 2738-2749.
    [27] Reiter M, Breitenbucher U, Dustdar S, et al. A novel framework for monitoring and analyzing quality of data in simulation workflows. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience. Stockholm, Sweden. 2011. 105-112.
    [28] Kopp O, Breitenbucher U, Reiter M, et al. Quality of data driven simulation workflows. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science. Chicago, IL, USA. 2012. 1-8.
    [29] Vanbrabant L, Martin N, Ramaekers K, et al. Quality of input data in emergency department simulations: Framework and assessment techniques. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2019, 91: 83-101. [doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.12.002
    [30] 徐刚, 陈红, 荀启明. 电子商务平台数据质量控制系统及仿真模型分析. 现代情报, 2016, 36(11): 87-93. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2016.11.016
    [31] 桑作军, 丁国华, 吴海东. 军事建模与仿真数据质量管理研究. 四川兵工学报, 2015, 36(2): 84-86
    [32] 韩志军, 吴蕾, 柳少军, 等. 大型仿真系统数据质量持续改进模型研究. 第十三届中国系统仿真技术及其应用学术会议(SSTA 2011)论文集. 黄山, 中国. 2011. 533-537.
    [33] 韩志军, 李锰, 孙少斌. 大型仿真推演系统数据质量评估方法. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(1): 77-80, 84. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.01.018
    [34] Sun GB, Ming Y, Da W. Data quality evaluation process and methods of natural environment conceptual model in simulation systems. Proceedings of the Multiconference on Computational Engineering in Systems Applications. Beijing, China. 2006. 358-361.
    [35] Hamad H. A new metric for measuring metamodels quality-of-fit for deterministic simulations. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference. Monterey, QB, Canada. 2006. 882-888.
    [36] Sugihara M, Ishihara T, Hashimoto K, et al. A simulation-based soft error estimation methodology for computer systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design. San Jose, CA, USA. 2006. 196-203.
    [37] Gaudiani A, Luque E, García P, et al. Computing, a powerful tool for improving the parameters simulation quality in flood prediction. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 29: 299-309. [doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.027
    [38] Bokrantz J, Skoogh A, Andersson J, et al. A methodology for continuous quality assurance of production data. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference. Huntington Beach, CA, USA. 2015. 2088-2099.
    [39] 高峰, 康建东, 薛晓辉, 等. 电网在线仿真数据质量评估及自动校准方法. 宁夏电力, 2017, (1): 1-5, 11. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3643.2017.01.001
    [40] Zhang YC, Zhang J, Li W, et al. Research on quality-based data creditability evaluating method in complex systems simulation. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM/IEEE/SCS 26th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation. Zhangjiajie, China. 2012. 193-195.
    [41] 张英朝, 张静, 李伟, 等. 一种基于质量建模的复杂系统仿真数据可信性评价方法. 2012年第14届中国系统仿真技术及其应用学术年会论文集. 三亚, 中国. 2012. 73-76.
    [42] Dong JQ. Numerical data quality in simulation research: A reflection and epistemic implications. Decision Support Systems, 2019, 126: 113134. [doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113134
    [43] 许国珍, 焦鹏, 查亚兵. 仿真数据质量及VV&C研究. 计算机工程与科学, 2013, 35(4): 168-172. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-130X.2013.04.030
    [44] 许国珍, 焦鹏, 查亚兵. 基于元数据的仿真数据质量研究. 系统仿真技术, 2012, 8(2): 133-137, 148. [doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1964.2012.02.009
    [45] Buzacott JA, Cheng DWH. Quality modelling of assembly systems. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Winter Simulation. Dallas, TX, USA. 1984. 360-371.
    [46] Scholten H, Udink ten Cate AJ. Quality assessment of the simulation modeling process. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 1999, 22(2-3): 199-208. [doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00018-6
    [47] Markiegi U, Arrieta A, Etxeberria L, et al. White-box and black-box test quality metrics for configurable simulation models. Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference. Paris, France. 2019. 211-214.
    [48] Dransch D, Köthur P, Schulte S, et al. Assessing the quality of geoscientific simulation models with visual analytics methods— A design study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(10): 1459-1479. [doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.510800
    [49] Popescu V, Hoffmann C, Kilic S, et al. Producing high-quality visualizations of large-scale simulation. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization. Seattle, WA, USA. 2003. 575-580.
    [50] 白鸟正树. 工学シミュレーションの品質マネジメント. エレクトロニクス実装学術講演大会講演論文集. 2012. 115-118.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

卞雪卡,刘玉坤.建模与仿真实施质量文献综述.计算机系统应用,2020,29(6):56-63

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1403
  • 下载次数: 6195
  • HTML阅读次数: 3561
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15
  • 最后修改日期:2019-12-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-12
文章二维码
您是第11482298位访问者
版权所有:中国科学院软件研究所 京ICP备05046678号-3
地址:北京海淀区中关村南四街4号 中科院软件园区 7号楼305房间,邮政编码:100190
电话:010-62661041 传真: Email:csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

京公网安备 11040202500063号