基于前景理论的不确定TOPSIS多属性决策方法
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(61773123)


Prospect Theory-Based TOPSIS Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对属性权重未知、属性值为犹豫模糊集的多属性决策问题,本文提出一种基于前景理论和粗糙集的多属性决策方法,充分考虑了决策者心理风险因素对决策结果的影响.首先,以正、负理想点作为参考点计算各属性下的前景价值函数,定义新的综合前景值,并根据给定的阈值得到判断矩阵;然后,根据判断矩阵进行属性约简,确定属性权重;最后,计算各备选方案的加权综合前景值,利用TOPSIS方法对备选方案进行排序,并通过算例证实该方法的可行性和有效性.

    Abstract:

    For the multi-attribute decision making problem with attribute weights being unknown and attribute values being hesitant fuzzy sets, this study proposes a multi-attribute decision making method based on prospect theory and rough set, which fully considers the influence of decision makers' psychological risk factors on decision results. Firstly, the positive and negative ideal points are used as reference points to calculate the prospect value function under each attribute and to define a new comprehensive prospect value, and a discernibility matrix is obtained according to the given threshold. Then, according to the discernibility matrix, attribute reduction is performed to determine the attribute weight. Finally, the weighted comprehensive prospect value of each alternative is calculated, and the TOPSIS method is used to rank all the alternatives. An example is given to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

    参考文献
    [1] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3):338-353.[doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [2] Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1):87-96.[doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
    [3] Turksen IB. Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(2):191-210.[doi:10.1016/0165-0114(86)90077-1
    [4] Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(6):529-539
    [5] Xu ZS, Xia MM. On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26(5):410-425.[doi:10.1002/int.v26.5
    [6] Chen N, Xu ZS. Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE Ⅱ approach:A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Information Sciences, 2015, 292:175-197.[doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.054
    [7] Xu ZS, Zhang XL. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 52(6):53-64
    [8] 刘小弟, 朱建军, 刘思峰. 犹豫模糊信息下的双向投影决策方法. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(10):2637-2644.[doi:10.12011/1000-6788(2014)10-2637
    [9] Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Information Sciences, 2014, 271(3):125-142
    [10] Farhadinia B, Xu ZS. Distance and aggregation-based methodologies for hesitant fuzzy decision making. Cognitive Computation, 2017, 9(1):81-94.[doi:10.1007/s12559-016-9436-2
    [11] 王新鑫, 杨雁, 徐泽水, 等. 基于专家对应准则的犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法. 模糊系统与数学, 2017, 31(1):101-108
    [12] 林松, 刘小弟, 朱建军, 等. 基于改进符号距离的权重未知犹豫模糊决策方法. 控制与决策, 2018, 33(1):186-192
    [13] Tang XA, Peng ZL, Ding HN, et al. Novel distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(6):3903-3916
    [14] 王应明, 阙翠平, 蓝以信. 基于前景理论的犹豫模糊TOPSIS多属性决策方法. 控制与决策, 2017, 32(5):864-870
    [15] Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, 1982, 11(5):341-356
    [16] Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1):1-47.[doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00167-3
    [17] Torra V, Narukawa Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Jeju Island, South Korea. 2009. 1378-1382.
    [18] Xu ZS, Xia MM. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2011, 181(11):2128-2138.[doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028
    [19] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4):297-323.[doi:10.1007/BF00122574
    [20] Xu ZS, Xia MM. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2011, 181(11):2128-2138.[doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028
    [21] Zhu B, Xu ZS. Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2013, 64(12):1831-1840.[doi:10.1057/jors.2013.7
    [22] 张小路. 基于犹豫模糊信息的多属性决策方法研究[博士学位论文]. 南京:东南大学, 2015.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

梁薇,王应明.基于前景理论的不确定TOPSIS多属性决策方法.计算机系统应用,2019,28(3):36-42

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-12
  • 最后修改日期:2018-10-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-02-22
文章二维码
您是第11203767位访问者
版权所有:中国科学院软件研究所 京ICP备05046678号-3
地址:北京海淀区中关村南四街4号 中科院软件园区 7号楼305房间,邮政编码:100190
电话:010-62661041 传真: Email:csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

京公网安备 11040202500063号