AIPUB归智期刊联盟

微信公众号

网站二维码

2025年5月6日 6:10 星期二
首页 > 过刊浏览>2014年第23卷第7期 >1-6
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
HTTP移动流媒体QoE管理综述
作者:
基金项目:

新一代宽带无线移动通信网重大专项（2012ZX03001034）；国家自然科学基金（61372113）


Overview of QoE Management Based on HTTP Mobile Streaming
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • |
  • 引证文献
    • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着移动通信网络和技术的快速发展，多媒体信息的大量涌现，人们对多媒体信息服务的要求也越来越高. 基于HTTP协议的移动流媒体由于拥有广泛运营基础的Web服务器网络环境，部署简单，适用范围广泛等优点成为研究的热点. 简要介绍了HTTP移动流媒体的相关特点，重点分析了影响HTTP移动流媒体用户体验质量的各层因素，归纳总结了评价方法和现有的工具，并对HTTP移动流媒体相应的优化进行了介绍，最后对HTTP移动流媒体QoE管理进行了总结和展望.

    Abstract:

    With the development of mobile communications network technology, and the springing up of multimedia information, an increasing requirement for multimedia information service is needed. The mobile streaming media based on HTTP protocol becomes a research hotspot with its advantages of Web server network environment which has wide operating foundation, simple deployment and wide application. This paper briefly introduces the relevant characteristic of mobile streaming media based on HTTP protocol. We selectively analyse each layer factors that influence the QoE of the HTTP mobile streaming media. We investigate the evaluation methods and the existing tools. The relevant optimization methods of the HTTP mobile streaming media are introduced. Finally, we summarize and forecast the QoE management based on HTTP mobile streaming.

    参考文献
    1 3GPP TS 26.247 v10.1.0. Transparent End-to-End Packet Switched Streaming Service (PSS); Progressive Download and Dynamic Adaptive Streaming Over HTTP (3GP-DASH). Release 10, 2011-06.
    2 林闯, 胡杰, 孔祥震.用户体验质量(QoE)的模型与评价方法综述.计算机学报, 2012(1):1-15.
    3 Latré S, Staelens N, Simoens P. On-Line estimation of the QoE of progressive download services in multimedia access networks. ICOMP 2008. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 2008. 14-17.
    4 Mok RKP, Chan EWW, Chang RKC. Measuring the Quality of Experience of HTTP Video Streaming. Integrated Network Management(IM). 2011 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium. Dublin. 2011. 485-492.
    5 Dobrian F, Sekar V, Stoica I. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement, SIGCOMM'11. ACM, 2011.
    6 Oyman O, Singh S. Quality of Experience for HTTP Adaptive Streaming Services. IEEE Communications Magazine, April 2012, 50(4): 20-27.
    7 Menkovski V, Liotta A. QoE for Mobile Streaming. Mobile Multimedia-User and Technology Perspectives, 2012.
    8 Mohamed S, Rubino G.. A study of real-time packet video quality using random neural networks. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., 2002, 12(12): 1071-1083.
    9 International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. Report: ITU TP. 800, 1996.
    10 Hubbe P, Kerboeuf S, Leprovost Y. An Innovative Tool for Measuring Video Streaming QoE. http://www2.alcatel-lucent.com/techzine/an-innovative-tool-for-measuring-video-streaming-QoE/, 2011-1.
    11 Singh DK, Hadjadj-Aoul Y, Rubino G. Quality of Experience estimation for adaptive HTTP/TCP video streaming using H.264/AVC. The 9th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. 2012. 127-131.
    12 Mohamed S, Rubino G. A study of real-time packet video quality using random neural networks. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech., 2002, 12(12): 1071-121083.
    13 Staehle B, Hirth M, Wamser F, Pries R, Staehle D. YoMo: A YouTube Application Comfort Monitoring Tool. University of Würzburg, Tech. Rep.467, 2010-03.
    14 Ameigeiras P, Azcona-Rivas A, Navarro-Ortiz J, Ramos-Muõz JJ, López-Soler MJ. A simple model for predicting the number and duration of rebuffering events for YouTube flows. IEEE Communications Letters, 2012, 2(16):278-280.
    15 Lohmar T, Einarsson T, Frojdh P. Dynamic adaptive HTTP streaming of live content. World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks(WoWMoM). Lucca. 2011. 1-8.
    16 Gorius M, Shuai Y, Herfet T. Dynamic media streaming over wireless and mobile IP networks. Consumer Electronics-Berlin(ICCE-Berlin). Sept 2012: 158-162.
    17 Zhou B, Wen J, Wang J. HTTP streaming over an improved TCP congestion control algorithm. Multimedia Technology(ICMT). Hangzhou. July 2011. 3093-3096.
    18 Rajiullah M, Brunstrom A. On the effectiveness of PR-SCTP in networks with competing traffic. Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). 2011. 898-905.
    19 Zhou B, Wang JY, Zou ZX, Wen JT. Bandwidth estimation and rate adaptation in HTTP streaming. Computing, Networking and Communications(ICNC). Maui. 2012. 734-738.
    20 Thang TC, Pham AT, Nguyen HX. Video streaming over HTTP with dynamic resource prediction. Communications and Electronics(ICCE). Hue. 2012-08. 130-135.
    21 Mueller C, Lederer S, Timmerer C. A proxy effect analyis and fair adatpation algorithm for multiple competing Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP clients. San Diego. 2012. 1-6.
    22 Ma KJ, Bartos R. HTTP Live Streaming Bandwidth Management Using Intelligent Segment Selection. Global Telecommunicaitons Conference(GLOBECOM 2011), Huston. 2011. 1-5.
    23 Kupka T, Halvorsen P, Griwodz C. An evaluation of live adaptive HTTP segment streaming request strategies. 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). Bonn. 2011. 604-612.
    24 Bouten N, Latre S, Van de Meerssche W. An autonomic delivery framework for HTTP adaptive streaming in multicast-enabled multimedia access networks. Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). Maui, HI. April 2012. 1248-1253.
    25 Phatak AMV, Dongaonkar BR. Applying hyperthreading technology for evaluating the performance of HTTP server for stored audio/video retrieval, Nagpur, 2009: 644-647.
    26 Mok KPR, Luo XP, Chan WWE, Chang RKC. QDASH:A QoE-aware DASH system. Proc. of the 3rd Multimedia Systems Conference. 2012. 11-22.
    27 Zhou C, Zhang XG, Huo LS. A control-theoretic approach to rate adaptation for dynamic HTTP streaming. Visual Communications and Immage Processing(VCIP). San Diego. 2012. 1-6.
    28 Mitra S, Swaminathan V. An optimal client buffer model for multiplexing HTTP streams. Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP). Banff, AB. 2012. 283-288
    29 Thang TC, Kang JW, Pham AT. Quality-guided adaptivity for audiovisual content streaming by MPEG DASH. Consumer Electronics(ICCE). Las Vegas. 2012. 94-95.
    30 Hofmann I, Farber N, Fuchs H. A study of network performance with application to adaptive HTTP Streaming, Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting(BMSB). Nuremberg. 2011. 1-6
    31 Lee E, Choi T, Lee J. Fast reconnection of adaptive HTTP Streaming in heterogeneous networks. Network Infrastructure and Digital Content(IC-NIDC). Beijing. 2012. 299-304.
    32 Jang M, Oh H, Yang J. Implementation of continuous HTTP live streaming using playback position request mechanism in heterogeneous networks. Advanced Communication Technology(ICACT). 2013. 990-993.
    33 Wamser F, Hock D, Seufert M, et al. Using buffered playtime for QoE-oriented resourcemanagement of YouTube video streaming. Trans. on Emergin Telecommunications Technologies, 2013, 24: 288-302
    34 Wamser F, Staehle D, Prokopec J, Maeder A, Tran-Gia P. Utilizing buffered YouTube playtime for QoE-oriented scheduling in OFDMA networks. Teletraffic Congress (ITC 24). 2012. 1-8.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈坚,黄凤辉,周文安,黄雅君. HTTP移动流媒体QoE管理综述.计算机系统应用,2014,23(7):1-6

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2150
  • 下载次数: 6462
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-07
  • 最后修改日期:2013-12-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-08-15
文章二维码
友情链接:中国科学院软件研究所中国计算机学会中国科学院国家自然科学基金委员会软件学报
您是第11508284位访问者
版权所有：中国科学院软件研究所 京ICP备05046678号-3
地址：北京海淀区中关村南四街4号 中科院软件园区 7号楼305房间,邮政编码：100190
电话：010-62661041 传真： Email：csa (a) iscas.ac.cn
技术支持：北京勤云科技发展有限公司

京公网安备 11040202500063号